https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/ Sat, 06 Jun 2026 00:33:31 +0000 Science - Michael Teachings Channeling - Q & A en https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/330/evolution Wed, 29 May 2013 11:54:39 +0000 Science ubiquitous 330@/channeling/discussions Someone made the statement that he had considered physical evolution to be finished now, or that it was going backwards. Is it?

DEFINITELY THE ADAPTATIONS CONTINUE. IF YOU WISH TO VERIFY THIS, PIT YOUR OWN STAMINA AGAINST THAT OF SOME HISTORICAL CHARACTERS WHO WALKED THOUSANDS OF MILES OVER MOUNTAINS AND DESERTS IN THE NORMAL COURSE OF LIFE AND GREW STRONGER FROM THE EXPERIENCE.

SOURCE: Michael Teachings Transcripts]]> https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/327/atomic-theory Tue, 28 May 2013 21:19:22 +0000 Science ubiquitous 327@/channeling/discussions Someone asked if the atomic theory/physical material information is relevant to human life. Is what physical materials are composed of important to the understanding of what life is all about?

ONLY IN THE SENSE THAT IT GIVES THE PERSONALITY SOME UNDERSTANDING OF ITS MILIEU AND THE FACT THAT THE PERSONALITY CAN BE SUBSTANTIALLY ALTERED CHEMICALLY. INSOFAR AS SPIRITUALITY IS CONCERNED, THERE IS NO RELATION. THE ONLY CONNECTION THAT COULD POSSIBLY BE MADE IS THAT ALL THINGS PHYSICAL UNDERGO THE SAME CYCLIC EVOLUTION, AS DO ALL THINGS SPIRITUAL — IN OTHER WORDS, AN UPWARD EVOLUTION. THE ATOMIC TABLE SHOWS THE SAME UPWARD EVOLUTION AS DO THE COSMOS THEMSELVES [sic]. STARS ON THE MAIN SEQUENCE ARE UNDERGOING A PHYSICAL EVOLUTION THAT RESEMBLES THAT UNDERGONE BY ALL SENTIENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE.

SOURCE: Michael Teachings Transcripts]]> https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/277/big-bang-theory Mon, 27 May 2013 00:31:28 +0000 Science ubiquitous 277@/channeling/discussions My question is about Grand Cycles. Does the Big Bang that started the Universe correlate to the start of a Grand Cycle? Or doe Grand Cycles occur several times within the lifespan of a Universe? For instance, if one has 12 previous Grand Cycles were they in this Universe, 12 previous universes, or some in this one and some in prior universes?

MICHAEL: The scientific label Big Bang as it is used to describe the beginnings of the Universe is useful in that human fragments tend to think in linear terms and so there has to be a Beginning. In actuality, creation is more like a moebus ribbon, bending around until it meets itself coming back. This is not easy to envision or understand. Some of your science fiction authors have had a glimmering of what this means and have attempted to describe it in words. With various degrees of success.

To answer the question, No, the Big Bang is not the beginning of a Grand Cycle. There have been a number of Grand Cycles for this creation and this creation is only one of billions. However, for fragments in this creation, their experience of cycles will be enveloped in their universe. IT is part of the orderliness of creation that universes do not interact.

Channeled by Nancy Gordon
]]> en