<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
      <title>Famous People - Michael Teachings Channeling - Q & A </title>
      <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 00:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
          <description>Famous People - Michael Teachings Channeling - Q &amp; A</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <atom:link href="https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/categories/famous-people/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
        <title>Boris Karloff</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/364/boris-karloff</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 04:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">364@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[		 	 	 		<div title="Page 74">			<div>				<div>					<p><span>I would like Overleaves for Boris Karloff, and any relevant comments. </span></p>					<p><span>THIS FRAGMENT WAS A MID-CYCLE MATURE PRIEST IN THE PASSION MODE, WITH A GOAL OF DOMINANCE, A CYNIC IN THE EMOTIONAL PART OF THE INTELLECTUAL CENTER. HE HAD A SATURN/MERCURY BODY TYPE AND A CHIEF FEATURE, VERY STRONG, OF ARROGANCE, WITH A SECONDARY OF GREED, MANIFESTING IN A NEED FOR PUBLIC ACCLAIM. HE WAS FIFTH CAST IN HIS CADENCE AND HIS CADENCE WAS NUMBER TWO IN THE GREATER CADENCE. HE IS MEMBER OF ENTITY TWO, CADRE SEVEN. THIS FRAGMENT HAS AN INCARNATE PRIEST ESSENCE TWIN, WHOM HE DID KNOW AND WITH WHOM HE HAD A PASSIONATE LOVE AFFAIR. HE HAS A DISCARNATE SAGE TASK COMPANION WHO HAS ALWAYS HAD A GREAT DEAL OF INFLUENCE ON HIM. THIS FRAGMENT IS VERY INTERESTING IN MANY WAYS. THERE WAS THE SIDE OF HIM THAT WAS THE COMMITTED THESPIAN PAR EXCELLENCE, AND THERE WAS THE OTHER SIDE WHERE THE DARK PRIEST WALKED. THIS FRAGMENT INC1URRED SERIOUS FINANCIAL KARMA IN THAT LIFE, AND IT IS THOUGHT THAT HE WILL MAKE CERTAIN THAT IT GETS PAID IN THE NEXT LIFE. THIS FRAGMENT WAS AN ARCHBISHOP DURING THE HEIGHT OF THE SPANISH INQUISITION, AND SPENT THE NEXT FOUR LIFETIMES DOING GOOD WORKS FOR THAT LIFE. WE WOULD NOT SAY THAT HE WAS CRUEL IN THE IMMEDIATE PAST LIFE; IN FACT, HE WAS VERY GOOD TO HIS FRIENDS. HE DID NOT, HOWEVER. HAVE MUCH RESPECT FOR OTHER FRAGMENTS’ MONEY AND THEREIN LAY THE RUB.&nbsp;</span></p>				</div>			</div>		</div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Steve Jobs</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/357/steve-jobs</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 02:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">357@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span>STEVE JOBS</span><br /><br /><span>One of the Yarbro channels got that he was a 7th-young king. In addition, I got warrior ET, warrior/scholar casting, “honorary warrior,” beauty orientation, 51/49 male/female, 61 frequency, 12 previous cycles, freedom/adventure/power, growth, realist, passion, moving/emotional part, arrogance, mercurial/martial.</span><br /><br /><span>Last night, a client asked about what Steve Jobs' passing over was like, considering that he wasn't such a nice person a certain amount of the time. Michael said he had a positive experience passing over, and that he considers the positives to have outweighed the negatives in this lifetime. Most souls have a life review and he will no doubt do that. However, in seeing not only his actions but how they affected others, his guides will not force him to interpret those events in any particular way; they will be Socratic and ask probing questions. It will still be his choice to decide whether his behavior was appropriate. Michael felt sure that he would want to work on his "interpersonal relationship skills" in future lifetimes, but it's hard for kings (and warriors) to realize how harshly they come off to others, since they have pretty tough hides themselves. Also, because they look at the big action picture, it's easy for them to think that their harshness is necessary for the greater accomplishment and to accept some "collateral damage" in the form of hurt feelings, etc., especially when they think they're right.</span><br /><br /><span>Shepherd</span>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>George Washington</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/356/george-washington</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 02:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">356@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span>I've been listening to an audiobook of a George Washington biography by Ron Chernow. I was curious, so I channeled his chart. I always take celebrity overleaves with a grain of salt, since it's possible that many channels have already gotten information, but I share what I got for what it's worth:</span><br /><br /><span>3rd-mature king, male warrior ET, scholar/sage casting, growth, stoic, reserve, moving/emotional part, arrogance, mercurial/saturnian.</span><br /><br /><span>I am finding him to have been a very admirable person. I had previously thought him to be rather wooden, but although he could be formal, he also expressed deep feelings. In his younger days, he was a consummate athlete and was said to dance beautifully. He was fastidious about seeking a wide range of opinions before making a carefully reasoned decision, and continually sought to better himself. He was the most loved and famous American of his day from the war onward, and was mobbed when he went out in public or travelled, much like today's celebrities.</span><br /><br /><span>He was slow to evolve on the slavery issue. He freed his slaves in his will.</span><br /><br /><span>Terence Powers posted that he remembered a Yarbro channel saying that Washington was a young warrior, and I could also see a case for that. Thoughts?</span><br /><br /><span>Shepherd</span>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Thomas Jefferson</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/355/thomas-jefferson</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 02:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">355@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span>I listened to an audiobook about Jefferson and was curious what I'd get for his overleaves. I take celebrity overleaves with a grain of salt, but these seem reasonable:</span><br /><br /><span>Thomas Jefferson: 3rd-old scholar, no ET, king/artisan casting, 58/42, 47 frequency, 11 previous cycles, discrimination, realist, caution, intellectual/emotional part, arrogance, mercurial/lunar/jovial.</span><br /><br /><span>All the best,</span><br /><span>Shepherd</span>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Bill Maher</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/354/bill-maher</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 23:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">354@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span>In October, we discussed Bill Maher, Jr. He was described as brash and mean-spirited. I was curious about his overleaves and did his chart. I expected to find that he's a cynic. Instead I got that he's a pragmatist sliding to cynic (he doesn't actually *feel* that acidic). Add that to being an "honorary king" with very high male (focused) energy, power mode, and arrogance, and I think it fits. Plus third young is the warrior level of the warrior <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.michaelteachings.com/soul_age_index.html">soul age</a>. I was surprised by growth rather than discrimination, but he doesn't have discriminating eyes.</span><br /><br /><span>Here's what I got:</span><br /><br /><span>Third-young sage, discarnate king ET, king/artisan casting, 85/15, 47 frequency, 10 previous cycles, growth, pragmatist sliding to cynic, power, moving/moving part, arrogance, saturnian/martial/neptunian.</span><br /><br /><span>I got him in cadre 10/entity 2. I don't know how that would translate into other channels' cadre numbering, but according to my channeling, he's in the same entity as James Cameron, Joel Goldsmith, Kris Kristofferson, and Alexander Lowen. Cameron is also quite abrasive.</span><br /><div><span><br /></span></div><div><span>SH</span></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Chief Justice Roberts</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/352/chief-justice-roberts</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 23:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">352@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span>JOHN R:</span><br /><br /><span>Chief Justice Roberts would be another fascinating chart to look at.</span><br /><br /><span>SHEPHERD:</span><br /><br /><span>I got him as a 6th-young sage, discarnate priest ET, scholar/warrior casting, 68/32, 49 frequency, 11 previous cycles, acceptance, spiritualist, aggression, intellectual/moving part, greed, mercurial/martial. Needs are adventure/power/acceptance.</span><br /><br /><span>In the cadre numbering system Michael uses through me, he's in 8/7, the same (according to my channeling) as Bela Bartok, David Pogue, Andrea Thompson, and Mark Twain.</span><br /><br /><span>We grew up in the same town. Long Beach, Indiana, is a part of Michigan City. He is four months younger than me. He went to a private school but I have a vague memory of having met him on a bus in Long Beach in my early teens, and so does a close friend of mine. I was in a theater group with someone who went to school with him. Hence my curiosity.</span><br /><br /><span>Apparently, he was very conservative even as a child, and always whip smart (and sage-in-acceptance likable).</span>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Luna the Whale</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/351/luna-the-whale</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 22:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">351@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span>There's a documentary called "The Whale" that's "the true story of Luna, a young, wild killer (orca) whale who tries to befriend people on the rugged west coast of Vancouver Island." I channeled his chart:</span><br /><br /><span>7th-mature priest, no ET, sage/artisan casting, 41/59 male/female, 63 frequency, 17 previous cycles, freedom/adventure/expression, acceptance, spiritualist, passion, intellectual/moving part.</span><br /><br /><span>Shepherd</span>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Oliver Sacks</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/350/oliver-sacks</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 22:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">350@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span>I recently channeled Oliver Sacks's chart:</span><br /><br /><span>4th old priest, discarnate sage ET, king/server casting, 49/51, 73 frequency, 15 previous cycles, discrimination, spiritualist, passion, emotional/intellectual part, stubbornness, saturnian/jovial.</span><br /><br /><span>All the best,</span><br /><span>Shepherd</span>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Robin Williams</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/349/robin-williams</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 22:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">349@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span>Robin Williams was one of the most universally loved figures ever. I wish someone could have taught him about artisans being the most sensitive and vulnerable of the roles, due to their five inputs, and techniques for "aural hygiene," how to keep one's energy field clear and well-organized. It can make a big difference. I think that energy medicine will be the next big thing. We need to become energy-literate.</span><br /><br /><span>This is a chart I did a while back:</span><br /><br /><span>7th-mature artisan, sage male ET, priest/sage casting, 42/58, 83 frequency, 11 previous cycles, acceptance, spiritualist, passion, emotional/moving part, erasing stubbornness, martial/mercurial.&nbsp;</span><div><span><br /></span></div><div><span>SH</span></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>The Roosevelts</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/348/the-roosevelts</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 20:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">348@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span>No doubt a lot of us enjoyed the new Ken Burns documentary series about the Roosevelts. Eleanor wasn't mentioned in the original transcripts but Franklin was given as a mature sage, and Teddy, a young warrior.</span><br /><br /><span>I knew the least about Teddy and thought it was a great portrayal of a young warrior largely in positive poles. Teddy was a Republican but socially quite progressive and reform-minded. His colonialism and love and glorification of war were blind spots but not surprising for a third-young warrior: three is the warrior number, so he was a warrior at the warrior level of the warrior <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.michaelteachings.com/soul_age_index.html">soul age</a>. For him, war was an opportunity to demonstrate bravery and patriotism. His "bully pulpit" illustrates warrior persuasion. He had an interesting self-karma to have have been sickly as a child; he largely overcame that but his asthma and other health challenges continued to be issues that clashed with his enormous energy and drive.</span><br /><br /><span>FDR's polio, of course, was a huge self-karma. Overcoming it deepened his compassion and ability to be of service.</span><br /><br /><span>I channeled their charts. (The usual caveats about celebrity overleaves apply, and other channels have gotten some different information.) I was particularly interested to get that Franklin and Eleanor were in the same entity, 3/6 (1/6 through some channels) and that Frances Perkins, his Secretary of Labor (and the first woman cabinet member) and friend was his essence twin.</span><br /><br /><span>Here's what I got:</span><br /><br /><span>Eleanor Roosevelt: 2nd-old server, discarnate scholar ET, warrior/server casting, 55/45, 47 frequency, 13 previous cycles, acceptance, spiritualist/stoic, power, emotional/intellectual, greed (fixated on appreciation), venusian/saturnian/martial.</span><br /><br /><span>Franklin Roosevelt: 3rd-mature sage, warrior ET (Frances Perkins), scholar/priest casting, 58/42, 47 frequency, 14 previous cycles, growth, idealist, passion, physical/intellectual part, impatience (arrogance early in life), mercurial/jovial.</span><br /><br /><span>Theodore Roosevelt: 3rd-young warrior, discarnate sage ET, sage/server casting, 41/59, 47 frequency, 10 previous cycles, growth, idealist, passion, emotional /intellectual part, stubbornness, martial/saturnian/jovial.</span><br /><br /><span>Does anyone else have thoughts about the documentary and the Roosevelts?</span><br /><br /><span>All the best,</span><br /><span>Shepherd</span>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Bradley Cooper</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/347/bradley-cooper</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 20:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">347@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span>Bradley Cooper: 2nd-mature sage, discarnate priest ET, sage/artisan casting, 55/45, 63 frequency, 12 previous cycles, discrimination, spiritualist, caution, intellectual/moving part, arrogance, saturnian/martial.</span><div><span><br /></span></div><div><span>SH</span></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Ginger Rogers</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/346/ginger-rogers</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 20:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">346@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span>Ginger Rogers: 4th-mature sage, discarnate warrior ET, warrior/artisan casting, 47/53, 82 frequency, 12 previous cycles, discrimination, spiritualist, passion, intellectual/moving part, arrogance, martial/solar.</span>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Norman Cousins</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/345/norman-cousins</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 20:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">345@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span>I channeled Norman Cousins' chart:</span><br /><br /><span>5th-old priest, discarnate sage ET, scholar/king casting, 47/53, 49 frequency, 10 previous cycles, flow, spiritualist, power, intellectual/moving part, arrogance, mercurial/saturnian.</span><div><span><br /></span></div><div><span>SH</span></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Fred Astaire</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/344/fred-astaire</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 20:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">344@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span>Fred Astaire: 5th-mature artisan, male priest ET, king/server casting, 45/55, 47 frequency, 13 previous cycles, growth, realist, caution, emotional/moving part, mercurial/martial/saturnian, cadre 4/entity six in the numbering Michael uses through me (2/6 via some other channels).</span><br /><br /><span>I'd assumed that he was moving centered, but moving part of emotional makes sense, too.</span><div><span><br /></span></div><div><span>SH</span></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Tom Robbins</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/343/tom-robbins</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 20:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">343@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span>Tom Robbins is one of my favorite authors. I recently did his chart. I got him in cadre/entity 4/2 (2/2 by some other channels), 3rd-mature scholar, discarnate artisan ET, artisan/server casting, 48/52, 47 frequency, 10 previous cycles, acceptance, spiritualist, caution, moving/intellectual part, arrogance, mercurial/saturnian.</span><br /><br /><span>I'd thought him to be an artisan, but being an "honorary artisan" scholar makes sense, particular when considering the painstaking way he writes.</span><div><span><br /></span></div><div><span>Shepherd Hoodwin</span></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>John Muir</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/340/john-muir</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 14:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">340@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span>JOHN MUIR WAS AN OLD KING IN ACCEPTANCE.</span>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Norman Vincent Peale</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/339/norman-vincent-peale</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 14:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">339@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span>A PRIEST IN ACCEPTANCE</span>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Mozart</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/332/mozart</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 12:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">332@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span><i>Why do I have an affinity with Mozart?</i><br /><br />YOU ADMIRED HIS PRECISION. THIS WAS A MID CYCLE MATURE ARTISAN IN THE INTELLECTUAL PART OF MOVING CENTER, YES, IN THE PASSION MODE, IN ARROGANCE AND DOMINANCE, AN IDEALIST.<br /><br /><span>SOURCE: Michael Teachings Transcripts</span></span>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Leibnitz</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/328/leibnitz</link>
        <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 21:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">328@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span><i>What about Leibnitz?</i><br /><br />THIS WAS A FIFTH LEVEL MATURE SCHOLAR IN THE OBSERVATION MODE WITH A GOAL OF GROWTH, A SPIRITUALIST IN THE EMOTIONAL PART OF INTELLECTUAL CENTER. RENE [Thom] IS A FOURTH LEVEL YOUNG SCHOLAR IN THE OBSERVATION MODE WITH A GOAL OF GROWTH, A REALIST IN THE MOVING PART OF INTELLECTUAL CENTER.<br /><br /><span>SOURCE: Michael teachings Transcripts</span></span>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Sir Francis Drake</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/314/sir-francis-drake</link>
        <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 14:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">314@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span><i>Someone asked a question about Sir Francis Drake.</i><br /><br />THE MAN FRANCIS WAS NOT A KING; HE WAS A SCHOLAR — A FOURTH LEVEL YOUNG SCHOLAR, AN IDEALIST IN THE POWER MODE; MUCH ARROGANCE HERE.<br /><br /><span>SOURCE: Michael Teachings Transcripts</span></span>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Pontius Pilatus</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/296/pontius-pilatus</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 14:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">296@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span><i>Who is Pontius Pilatus?</i><br /><br />THE MAN PILATE WAS A SCHOLAR IN SUBMISSION. HE WAS A “VICTIM OF CIRCUMSTANCES”, AND OF CHOICE. THIS EVENT WAS STRONG IN THE GROUP. IT DID HAVE MUCH TO DO WITH BONDING OF THE INDIVIDUAL SOULS, AND THE PURPOSE OF THE CHOICE THIS LIFE, THE CHOICES OF INTERACTION ON THIS PLANE. THIS TIME AND PARALLEL TIME FRAMES DOES FIGURE IN, YES.<br /><br /><span>SOURCE: Michael Teachings Transcripts</span></span>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Joseph Campbell</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/285/joseph-campbell</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 01:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">285@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span><i>Someone told us about a Jungian workshop she went to over the weekend, and asked an SRG about a teacher there: Joseph Campbell, who wrote books. Is he a late Young Sage in Growth, Moving part of Intellectual Center, Saturn, Power, Vanity, Idealist?</i><br /><br />NOT IN THE POWER MODE, BUT PASSION; A FIFTH LEVEL YOUNG SAGE. ALL ELSE VALID. OFTEN IN THE VERY ELDERLY THE OVERLEAVES ARE AS BLURRED AS IN CHILDREN.<br /><br /><span>SOURCE: Michael Teachings Transcripts</span></span>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Burr Tillstrom</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/258/burr-tillstrom</link>
        <pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 15:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">258@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span><i>I'd like to know the role and <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.michaelteachings.com/soul_age_index.html">soul age</a> of a man named Burr Tillstrom who was a puppeteer in the 20th century, and whatever else you may want to tell me.</i>&nbsp;
</span><div><span><br /></span></div><div><span>MICHAEL: This fragment was a Mature Artisan. His talent for providing a symbol of life through the wooden dolls was immense. In his work with the miniature theater of puppets, he expressed life and love for all those who attended his productions. He was, however, somewhat melancholy in his own mind and heart. It was as if he found through his dolls the cheerfulness he himself was yearning for. He offered his gift freely and in every way it contributed to his life's work: Promoting joy.&nbsp;</span></div><div><span><span><br /></span></span></div><div><span><span>Channeled by Nancy Gordon</span></span></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Ovid</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/247/ovid</link>
        <pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 13:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">247@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span><i>I'm reading the work of the Roman poet, Ovid. What was his <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.michaelteachings.com/soul_age_index.html">soul age</a>, <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.michaelteachings.com/role_index.html">role</a>, chief feature etc. And what inspired him to write the Metamorphoses - it is such a beautiful work.</i>&nbsp;
</span><div><span><br /></span></div><div><span>MICHAEL: The fragment known as Ovid was a mature Priest in Arrogance. As a priest he considered himself compelled to explain the metaphysical world to those who could comprehend what he was about.&nbsp;</span></div><div><span><span><br /></span></span></div><div><span><span>Channeled by Nancy Gordon</span></span></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Prince Charles</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/242/prince-charles</link>
        <pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 00:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">242@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span>PRINCE CHARLES OF BRITAIN IS ALSO A SECOND LEVEL OLD WARRIOR IN THE OBSERVATION MODE, A SPIRITUALIST. HE IS MOSTLY LUNAR, SOME VENUSIAN.<br /><br /><span>SOURCE: Michael Teachings Transcripts</span></span>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Pearl Buck</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/241/pearl-buck</link>
        <pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 00:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">241@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span><i>How about another Old Slave?</i><br /><br />THE NOVELIST PEARL BUCK WAS A THIRD LEVEL OLD SLAVE IN THE PASSION MODE, IN SUBMISSION, A SPIRITUALIST WITH A CHIEF FEATURE OF STUBBORNNESS, MOSTLY VENUSIAN, SOME MERCURIAL, IN THE EMOTIONAL PART OF INTELLECTUAL CENTER. <br /><br /><span>SOURCE: Michael Teachings Transcripts</span></span>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Rasputin</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/240/rasputin</link>
        <pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 00:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">240@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span><i>What is the SRG of Gregory Rasputin?</i><br /><br />IT IS INTERESTING THAT THIS MAN WAS TWICE IN THE PAST AN ARCH DRUID, AND BROUGHT TO THIS LIFE A PAST STEEPED IN THE OCCULT. HE WAS A MID CYCLE MATURE PRIEST IN REJECTION, A CYNIC IN THE POWER MODE, IN THE MOVING PART OF EMOTIONAL CENTER, MOSTLY LUNAR, SOME SATURNINE; STUBBORNNESS.<br /><br /><span>SOURCE: Michael Teachings Transcripts</span></span>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>George Patton</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/239/george-patton</link>
        <pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 00:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">239@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span>GEORGE PATTON (OLD WARRIOR): THIS MAN GEORGE WAS A FIFTH LEVEL OLD WARRIOR IN DOMINANCE, IN THE PASSION MODE, A REALIST WITH A CHIEF FEATURE OF STUBBORNNESS. HE WAS MOSTLY MARTIAL, SOME SATURNINE, IN THE EMOTIONAL PART OF MOVING CENTER. INCIDENTALLY, HE HAD A VERY CLEAR MEMORY OF SOME PAST LIVES.<br /><br /><span>SOURCE: Michael Teachings Transcripts</span></span>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Richard Nixon</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/231/richard-nixon</link>
        <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 23:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">231@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span><i>Is Richard Nixon’s resignation a karmic ribbon with Alger Hiss?</i><br /><br />Yes.  In EGYPT in the year 800 these two souls exchanged hostilities and did EACH other in, One through lies that led to the execution of the other by poisoning. There has been much turmoil between these two souls, and in this lifetime we cannot be sure that they will agree that it is finally put to rest. Both baby souls will have another chance to encounter one another.<br /><br />Richard NIXON is in aggression. If he were to be in observation at this time, it would be possible for him to MOVE Beyond the point where he is immersed. He will not in this life move out Of aggression mode, nor the goal of stagnation, and he will Persevere in the nightmare until he gives up this life.<br /><br /><span>SOURCE: Michael Teachings Transcripts</span></span>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Carl Jung</title>
        <link>https://mail.michaelteachings.com/channeling/discussion/228/carl-jung</link>
        <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 23:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Famous People</category>
        <dc:creator>ubiquitous</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">228@/channeling/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<span><i>Is Carl Jung a Sage in Acceptance? Did he know this knowledge as Goethe did?</i><br /><br />MUCH OF THIS HE DID, YES. THIS WAS A FIFTH LEVEL OLD PRIEST.<br /><br /><span>SOURCE: Michael Teachings Transcripts</span></span>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
   <language>en</language>
   </channel>
</rss>
